Included support and tools
The proposal names role preparation, daily supervision, QA, reporting and application access. Pricing and scope; actual tools.
TRUE COST OF IN-HOUSE LEGAL STAFF
Base salary is only the visible cost. The calculator applies one 1.4 planning multiplier for the consolidated employer-burden and operating-overhead allowance, then compares the same team size at the published Telamanis per-member rate.

Loaded-cost comparison
Enter the annual base salary for one in-house role. The model applies a single 1.4 multiplier as one consolidated planning allowance for payroll taxes, benefits, healthcare, training, turnover, HR, and operating overhead, then compares the same team size at $3,500 per month per Telamanis member.
Visible vs. hidden
Use one consolidated planning allowance; do not add the same training and management costs again.
Cost stack
The salary line is visible. The loaded-cost side uses one consolidated planning allowance for payroll taxes, benefits, healthcare, training, turnover, HR, and operating overhead without adding those categories twice.

Compare a salary with its operating context. Use one consolidated planning allowance; do not add the same training and management costs again.
Decision model
At $65,000 base salary, × 1.4 = $91,000 modeled annual in-house cost. One Telamanis member is $42,000: $49,000, approximately 54%, lower in this example. Other inputs produce different results.

The published $3,500/month member rate includes training, supervision and Telamanis tools for the agreed workflow.
The proposal names role preparation, daily supervision, QA, reporting and application access. Pricing and scope; actual tools.
Attorney attention, particular errors, missed deadlines and HR exposures do not have universal dollar values here. Opportunity cost is a separate management consideration, not an extra savings input.
Third-party software, licenses, access or configuration dependencies are identified in the proposal. Equal team size does not prove equal output; role fit, workload and firm conditions matter.
FAQ
No. It is an illustrative planning model. It applies one 1.4 multiplier to base payroll for the consolidated employer-burden and operating-overhead allowance, then compares the same team size at the published Telamanis per-member rate.
It is one consolidated planning allowance for payroll taxes, benefits, healthcare, training, turnover, HR, and operating overhead. Those categories are not added again as separate inputs.
The calculator has team-size and base-salary inputs, not an attorney-rate input. It does not assign a separate dollar value to attorney attention, every error, missed deadline, morale issue, or HR exposure. It keeps those categories visible without pretending they have one universal price.
Guided systems review
Bring your real base-payroll assumptions to the staffing analysis and use the comparison as a planning conversation, not a savings guarantee.